History of project





Working with a dedicated team of three historians, Dr. Richards Plavnieks, Fred Zimmak, and Evan Robins, we began the process of recovering the camp’s forgotten history with a year-long investigation of evidence-based, archival research. The rigorous collection of factual data frames the larger quest to search for truth and justice in relation to this unremembered site.

The Locker of Memory project, in effect, liberates memory from the confines of forgetting the past. As director, I centralized the murder of the Jews as the dominant narrative. The project website features three groundbreaking timelines designed to portray a layered account of the site’s long history, starting in 1198 to present day events. Our primary focus Is between 1941-1944. A population chart, developed as a timeline, depicts 22 acts of murder and transfer, leading to the decline of Jews at the site. 3985 victims were reduced to 27 survivors over a period of four years.

Characterized as a story-telling project, research provided substance and accuracy. In addition to historic research, a team of world-renowned geospatial scientists, led by the late Professor Richard Freund, used cutting-edge, non-invasive ground penetrating radar to search for indicators of a lost mass grave. Returning to the site this summer, we expect to conclude the search with definitive evidence regarding the precise location of a mass grave.

Operating on a shoestring budget, we started with the deportation lists. We then assembled a trove of archival maps. Working in concert with a design team, we produced virtual tours of seven killing sites and an interactive timeline coupled with an interactive map depicting events at the camp. The digital design of these sites, using VR enhancements, was further amplified by a series of in-depth audio tapes on topics ranging from murder to community building. The interactive nature of the various concepts supported the educational component of the project. Finally, a number of videos, capturing a thematic focus of what took place at the camp, to include interviews with survivors, was integrated into the overall presentation of research. The work in its entirety, sets the stage for a new generation of historians, students, and descendants to build upon this dynamic body of research. To that end, Frostig established a survivor and descendants’ group that meets monthly, sharing family histories and surviving documents. An online heirloom gallery directly references the victims, and captures family stories attached to each object. Only one of these objects was actually at the camp.

As a result of building an extensive, multi-faceted body of research, the Jungfernhof concentration camp is now regarded as a place of memory. The project restores dignity to those imprisoned at the camp, who suffered immeasurable losses. In the coming year(s), I will work with Latvian officials and the Latvian Jewish community to build a permanent memorial at the site that will read as an everlasting beacon of hope.

The Jungfernhof Concentration Camp established under Nazi occupation existed for eighty years as a camp without a history. All records, documents, and photos pertaining to the camp’s history were destroyed. In 2013, plans to repurpose the land into a public park dedicated to leisure and relaxation was put forth by Riga’s district council. Clearing the land of debris and undergrowth, the city of Riga opened the Mazjumpravas manor site as a cultural and recreation space in 2017.

In 2019, plans to expand the park’s reach were temporarily interrupted by the return of a descendant in search of her grandparents’ final days at the camp. With a proposal in hand, Karen Frostig persuaded Riga’s city council to entertain the radical idea of installing a Holocaust memorial at the center of the park’s open space. Frostig is now working closely with Latvia’s Jewish community and public officials in Latvia to recover the lost grave and restore memory to land once inhabited by the Jungfernhof concentration camp. Plans for a permanent memorial to be situated near the recovered mass grave will bridge disparate concepts of public space, cultural heritage, Holocaust
history, and collective memory into a holistic presentation of memory as an integral component of community well-being.

“Jungfernhof” 2007. Photo: Karen Frostig

“Jungfernhof” 2019. Photo: Karen Frostig

The Names


The decision to rely on four listings of victims and survivors, deported to the Jungfernhof concentration camp on four different transports during the first week of December 1941, requires further explanation. There are no surviving records, documents, or photos of the Jungfernhof concentration camp in operation. Are the Nazi deportations lists the best and perhaps only source for identifying who was imprisoned at the camp during its first few months of operation? What was the criteria for these early deportations? Was it location—everyone in a house or on a street—or were there other measures, such as political affiliation, or education, or the degree of assimilation? Spiritual resistance in the Holocaust refers to a non-violent form of resistance linked to human values of dignity and civilization, running counter to Nazi attempts to dehumanize the prisoners. There were a number of artists and teachers at the camp. A series of covert classes and religious experiences, such as two Bar Mitzvah’s, a Chanukah party, and baking matzah, took place there. There was also a small group of non-Jews who were imprisoned at the camp.

The first transport deported from Berlin to Jungerfernhof, never arrived at the camp. The next four transports appear to have arrived at the Skirotava train station intact. The treacherous walk to the Jungfernhof concentration camp included beatings. Survivors report that a small number of victims were lost along the way. The next transport from Vienna arrived a few weeks later, some dying before arriving at the Skirotava train station. Over the next months, prisoners were transferred to the Riga Ghetto or Salaspils concentration camp, and prisoners at the Riga Ghetto were brought to Jungfernhof. These transfers, in addition to the Dünamünde Action, and about 700 unnamed deportees arriving at the Skirotava train station, make a reliable listing of prisoners at the camp nearly impossible to ascertain. The first four deportation lists appear to provide the most accurate reading of who was at the camp.

The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum released the deportation lists to the project. In addition, deportation lists can be downloaded from the USHMM’s website, as well as from the Leo Baeck Institute’s website. A team of technicians were hired to manually transfer the 3985 names of victims and survivors, preserved in PDF and jpeg formats, to an excel sheet. While this process can be prone to errors, the new listings appeared to correspond to the original lists. The names were then carefully reviewed for spelling errors and missing information. The excel sheets were compared to the original deportation lists and corroborated with the Buch der Erinnerung published in 2003, to ensure an additional layer of accuracy. This development enabled us to post the names to the website, allowing families to find the names of relatives, dates of birth, city of origin, and last addresses.

Ilya Lensky, Director of the Museum “Jews in Latvia” provides oversight for the review process. Please use this form for further inquiries.

Research Methodologies

Working as an interdisciplinary team of historians, technologists, artists and scientists, the range and scope of the research on a limited budget, is noteworthy. Joining historic rigor with technological innovation, the website displays a variety of research methodologies to include: timelines, 3-D tours, interactive timelines attached to an interactive map, animated maps. archival maps, base maps, photogammetry and 3-D modeling, interviews, case study presentations, videos, photography, and heirloom objects as story-telling devices. The work carries the project into a 21st century model of remembrance.

Initial Interviews

Starting in 2019, project director Karen Frostig conducted three testimonial interviews. Margers Vestermanis, the oldest living Latvian Holocaust survivor is also an esteemed historian and founder of the Jewish Museum in Latvia. As a teen, he was assigned work duties at the camp. Interviewed by project director and recorded on film in October 2019 by Latvian crew, he recalled his memories and knowledge about the camp, specifically, the location of a mass grave.  

A rare interview of two surviving brothers imprisoned at the camp in 1941, took place with Frostig in the fall of 2020. The Stern brothers, Peter and Samuel, shared their unique story about their short stay at the Jungfernhof camp as young children, ages six and two. Their unusual journey of escape and survival took place under the protective watch of their mother.

Frostig also interviewed Herbert Mai and Fred Zielberger, two survivors ro Wurzberg who lived on the same street #6 and #12, and were deported to Jungfernhof on the same train. Aboard the Nuremberg transport, they were the first to arrive at the camp and the last to leave, in July 1944. They returned to Wurzberg together. They came to the United States on the same ship and were drafted into the US army on the same day.

A third interview occurred with Fred Zimmak, son of Leonhard Zimmak. Leonhard testified against Rudolf Joachim Seck, chief commandant of the Jungfernhof concentration camp, aiding to his conviction as a Nazi sergeant committing crimes against humanity. Seck received a lifetime sentence by a West German court, dying at the Flensburg prison at age 66.

Folder covers of Nazi transports from Austria to the East. Photo Karen Frostig (2018)

Accessing Data

The Holocaust General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Shielded from historical analysis for more than 80 years, research concerning the Jungfernhof concentration camp is now available to historians, descendants, communities, and nations dealing with the long-term effects of genocide. Research about victims, perpetrators, and Latvian civilians is published on the website in a variety of formats: timelines, essays, maps, videos, and interviews. Maintaining open access is also in keeping with the Holocaust General Data Protection Regulation (2015).

Recital 125b of the GDPR specifies:
Where personal data are processed for archiving purposes, this Regulation should also apply to that processing, bearing in mind that this Regulation should not apply to deceased persons. Public authorities or public or private bodies that hold records of public interest should be services which, pursuant to Union or Member State law, have a legal obligation to acquire, preserve, appraise, arrange, describe, communicate, promote, disseminate and provide access to records of enduring value for general public interest. Member States should also be authorised to provide that personal data may be further processed for archiving purposes, for example with a view to providing specific information related to the political behaviour under former totalitarian state regimes, genocide, crimes against humanity, in particular the Holocaust, or war crimes.

The Archives

Project research focuses on the Jungfernhof concentration camp and surrounding sites, such as the Skirotava train station, the Riga Ghetto, Salaspils concentration camp, Kaiserwald concentration camp, the Bikernieki Forest, and the Rumbula Forest. Archival research spans countries and continents, prioritizing primary source material.

Archives in Germany

  • State archives in Hamburg

  • State archives in Berlin

  • Arolsen Archives: International Center on Nazi Persecution

  • State archives in Munich

  • Documentation Center in Munich

  • Documentation Center in Nuremberg

  • Flensburg Prison

Archives in Vienna

  • Documentation Centre of Austrian Resistance

  • Vienna Wiesenthal Institute for Holocaust Studies

  • Jewish Community of Vienna / Israelitische Kultusgemeinde Wien - IKG

  • National Fund of the Republic of Austria for Victims of National Socialism

  • Austrian Academy of Sciences

Latvian state archives

Russian archives

Archives in the United States

  • United States Holocaust Museum in DC

  • Forutunoff Archive for Holocaust Tetimonies Archives at Yale University

  • The Leo Baeck Institute in New York

  • Shoah Foundation Archives at the University of Southern California

  • The USC Dornsife Center for Advanced Genocide Research at the University of Southern California

Wiener Llibrary in the UK

Archives in Israel, most notably

  • Yad Vashem - the World Holocaust Remembrance Center in Israel.

Publication

Alexandra Lohse, applied research scholar of the Mandel Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies at the US Holocaust Memorial Museum approached Director Karen Frostig in June 2019, to submit an essay about the Jungfernhof concentration camp for the museum’s encyclopedic history of camps and other sites of detention erected by the Nazi Germany Regime and its allies. Frostig invited Dr. Richards Plavnieks, the Locker of Memory project’s lead historian, to co-author the essay. The essay represents the first vetted essay about the camp. Publication date is 2025.